Відео

Plan A: It's a visual metaphor for fixing something. Plan B: If all else fails, smack it with a wrench. It won't fix the computer but it might make you feel better.

Thanks! Glad it was helpful.

Thanks! I hope this one gains traction because it has a lot of promise if they keep heading in the direction they've been going, and some of the places they don't directly follow Exchange Server (like using OIDC for SSO rather than WS-Fed, or porting Graph to on-prem) are an improvement on it.

@@ProTechShow I will definitely spin this up in my lab and give it a go. The 5 mailbox limit made me think it wasn't worth trying but very pleased that can be worked around! This sort of thing has to be run for a while in the real world to see if it's got legs. And your right, 5 doesn't give you enough to put it into use in a "non critical" use case. I really don't understand their thinking here. They need to get the IT pros using it for personal use, then we are the people that will take it into production and that's where it will be licenced for full support. Let's hope they see this soon as they have potential for such a great product here. They have done the hard work building on all the great exchange protocols.

By "oversight", do you mean it was a bug? If this was not intentional I will re-test and pin a comment to that effect. On the Kopano/Gromox front the relationship between the different components seems to be somewhat obscured by time, name changes, and deleted articles, so I will take your word for it. I found multiple sources referring to Grommunio (at the time "grammm") as a fork of Kopano, and several references to Kopano making an accusation about stolen (proprietary) code by Grommunio/grammm. Most of the latter then linked to a statement by Grommunio refuting the accusation and stating that only free code was forked. The rebuttal by Grommunio largely concentrated on the number of changes to the Gromox component since a fork took place. As Grommunio chose to concentrate on Gromox in the rebuttal I believed this to be the component under contention; but articles provided for context by various sources have now been deleted along with the original accusation, so I can accept that some nuance has been lost to me.

@@ProTechShow It was not a "bug", the oversight was more of an editorial error. The pricing site has now been updated.

@@michaellangfermann5299 Yes, I can see the pricing page has been updated. I seem to recall having to get rid of a couple of shared mailboxes I used as personal archives because they pushed it over the limit, but I will check again and pin an update.

Confirmed and pinned a comment. Let me also take the opportunity to say thanks to you both and the rest of the team at Grommunio for the work you've put into this. I hope to see the project continue to grow and be a success.

I've been using Android with multiple Exchange accounts for years without any issues. I'm just using the default native app (currently on Samsung), not Outlook.

@@ProTechShow Samsung ships with exchange support, I think Sony did too, but that's not an integral part of Android neither Exchange nor Outlook accounts work in the generic case, specific ones may obviously you can handle emails using IMAP, but that's it also there are other apps that handle these, some made only for sync relying on the OS to expose data to other apps, but in my experience these were pretty unreliable

@@Z4KIUS Every non-Samsung Android device I've seen in years comes with the Gmail app as standard, which supports Exchange out-of-the-box

@@ProTechShow Gmail isn't a system provider but a 3p app and it doesn't seem to handle anything except mail, at least for personal accounts, even though they use the same protocol

@@Z4KIUS I just added an account to the app and it asked if I wanted to sync email, contacts, calendar, and tasks. Looks like the calendar opens in the Google Calendar app rather than Gmail itself, but it's all linked. I've honestly never come across a case of an Android phone not supporting ActiveSync out of the box, and we're talking tens of thousands of users - many doing BYoD. I'm sure if you get a raw de-Googlified Android image it could be a thing, but in terms of devices people actually use in the real world it's got to be pretty niche.

Thanks!

It's definitely a step up from the usual approach of slapping a web UI on top of Postfix + Dovecot and calling it done. There are some gaps, but being able to swap out the backend and keep the same familiar apps on the frontend makes it a lot more viable for me.

Worth a look indeed, and if you're on a budget it requires significantly fewer resources than a full Exchange server. My lab was starting to stretch at the seams and replacing Exchange with this gave me some space back to play with.

i don't but I hear that 0x00000050 is one of the hardest bsod to fix so good luck with that

This video is not about cracking BitLocker. It shows several legitimate methods to find your recovery key. In most cases there is no need to lose data just because you see a BitLocker screen. You should probably watch the video before commenting...

The manage-bde command is a preventative measure to make sure you have a copy of your key before you get locked out. If you're already locked out of your drive it won't work and you will need to use one of the other methods in the video to find your key. If your drive is unlocked and you still don't see a password then it's possible your drive was encrypted without creating a recovery key. You ought to be able to create one of your own with "manage-bde -protectors -add C: -rp", replacing C with the appropriate drive letter.

Glad to hear it!

Thanks!

You're welcome!

Glad it helped

Glad it was helpful, although it's worth noting that "CentOS Stream" is not the same thing as "CentOS Linux", which was originally just "CentOS" as referred to in this video. There have been a few changes since this video was published - check the pinned comment for a few updates.

If the root cause is a driver and you haven't identified it, you'll simply reinstall the problem. If the root cause is hardware, attempting to reinstall Windows is likely to make things worse and leave you with an unbootable machine. It's best to diagnose the root cause of the BSoD before reinstalling. A bluescreen crash will typically reboot back into Windows automatically once it's saved a memory dump. In the event the bluescreen occurs during the start-up process there's a section in the video with things you can try if Windows won't start. Finally, you can grab the dump file from the faulty device and run the analysis on another computer - it doesn't have to be the same one.

I can see that. Not sure if I like it, but I can see the appeal on the selling side. Extending tracking pixels beyond email and websites.

Aye. It was looking very promising for a while.

If you keep it on a completely isolated network that is a viable option. It's usually not practical for most use cases, but there are scenarios where the impact of a computer failure is so great that the safest thing to do is not let it talk to anything else. They're usually pretty specific scenarios, but in principle if you keep your computer disconnected from everything else then you're pretty secure.

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Glad to hear it helped

Thanks! Glad it was useful.

Sounds like it is encrypted using BitLocker. If you have your recovery key, try using the manage-bde command to unlock it. learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-commands/manage-bde-unlock

Depends how it works. If it's storing a unique key securely on the device then it's a valid possession factor. It depends how securely the key is stored and how well it validates the identity of a target website before it passes through the authentication. I wouldn't be keen if it syncs with multiple devices as it partly undermines the proof of possession. If it's a password manger extension that includes 2FA then my thoughts are covered in this video about the way Bitwarden does it: ua-cam.com/video/646dlqdcbMk/v-deo.html

Yup. Two very different skillsets.

@@ProTechShow indeed. btw, thanks for your videos bro! i have been having an absolute rut and mental block lately being paranoid over my personal cyber security and your videos on MFA weaknesses and this passbolt video really helped me ease the concerns i had :) i read that you do IT consulting in your bio. out of curiosity, how much would you charge for like a 15 minute zoom call? 😅

@@shuccle6161 Thanks! My “day job” is a senior position at an IT consultancy. I can't offer individual consulting engagements because it would create a conflict of interest if I were to provide similar services on a freelance basis as my primary employment.

@@ProTechShow ohh, that makes sense. what if it was free and just to help me out? haha. i honestly just wanted to chat for a bit to see if there was anything else i could learn for you. i work in IT, kinda, but mostly just helping people in my industry troubleshoot their tech, implement tech for them in their businesses, and stuff like that. but i was more so curious about cyber security stuff like email security, hygiene, and things like that. just for my own stuff. i wouldn't want to get you in trouble with your work tho so i would understand if you couldn't.

@@shuccle6161 afraid it's not something I plan to offer. I get a lot of messages asking for help with various things and if I accepted them all I'd need a small team to manage it. UA-cam is a hobby alongside my main job and I prefer to keep it that way, so it's easier just to say no to any individual assistance rather than try to pick who to help and who not to. It also helps keep a clear boundary from my main employment. Hope that makes sense. If I start saying "yes" to some then I'll be opening Pandora's box!

For organisations I recommend skipping the community edition and going straight to the business plan for the escrow feature that lets you recover end-users' keys for them. Expecting end-users to look after it themselves is asking for trouble. For a family the community version could work. It's a small enough group that you could walk them through the setup and save a copy of the key. As designated family tech person you would need to take ownership of the process to make sure it happens. It's not a tool I'd recommend to the average end-user without support.

Glad it helped

Yeah, Hyper-V is going to be around for a long while yet

Sometimes that works but it's better to diagnose the problem first. If it's a software issue and you reinstall the same software the problem will come back. If it's a hardware issue and it occurs while you're reimaging you'll be left with an unbootable machine.